Last updated: November 22, 2009 - 1:57pm
New electronic record systems installed in thousands of U.S. hospitals have done little to rein in skyrocketing healthcare costs, Harvard University researchers said in a study released on Friday. A review of roughly 4,000 hospitals from 2003 to 2007 found that while many had moved away from the paper files that still dominate the U.S. healthcare system, administrative costs actually rose, even among the most high-tech institutions. Advocates of such technology have been pushing for greater use of computerized health records to prevent costly errors and allow greater coordination among caregivers and patients. But adoption has been slow, prompting Congress to offer $19 billion in incentives as part of an economic stimulus bill. The results, published in The American Journal of Medicine, come as the Senate presses ahead with legislation to expand access to healthcare. While the bill does not provide funds to buy necessary equipment, it does aim to facilitate their use and boost standards.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Few US hospitals have electronic medical records (Updated)
- US pushes healthcare providers to share records electronically
- Little Benefit Seen, So Far, in Electronic Patient Records
- Researchers suggest EHR systems linked to higher costs
- Health IT: Big Costs, Big Savings
- Disproportionate share hospitals face IT disadvantages
- Advocates: Gov't needs to push harder for e-health
- Info exchanges not reaching potential: Harvard researchers
- Health info technology saves lives, costs: study
- Cleveland Clinic, MedStar join forces to move medical technologies to market
- IT helps with care coordination in heart disease prevention program
- Top hospitals use more advanced IT: report
- Survey: 10% of Hospitals Ready for Stage 1 of Meaningful Use
- A Major Glitch for Digitized Health-Care Records
- Mining Electronic Records for Revealing Health Data
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

