"Bandwidth hogs" join unicorns in realm of mythical creatures
Last updated: December 4, 2009 - 8:23am
There's a spectre haunting Internet service providers—the spectre of the "bandwidth hog." But does the mythical beast really exist? One telecom analyst is dubious, and he's calling out the ISPs. Benoit Felten is a Yankee Group analyst who covers fiber to the home issues from Paris, but his "bandwidth hog" challenge is a product of his personal blog, fiberevolution. Felten is a knowledgeable voice on fiber issues, and his blog reliably makes for an interesting read, but it rarely takes the adversarial tone it struck recently. Felten's basic critique concerns bandwidth caps—not because they exist, but because he sees them as disingenuous. Carriers can use them as a way to control bandwidth and wean people away from what the marketing department implicitly promises: all-you-can-surf Internet access for one monthly fee. The caps are sold as cutting off "bandwidth hogs" who use "more than their fair share," but Felten's take is that ISPs really have no idea if these people are causing any sort of actual congestion at all.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

Comments
I am not a fiber based provider, I am a fixed wireless provider. However, I can assure you that bandwidth hogs are real, do exist, and can cause great harm to the network. My operation is in the middle of the road as far as costs go, but some of my not so lucky colleagues are faced with costs upwards of $1,000 per megabit per second. At those costs, they can't let everyone run BitTorrent and stream NetFlix to 7 TVs per house. If they did tap into some low cost fiber (fiber may be available, but it's not low cost in these areas), the wireless equipment capable of penetrating foliage and dealing with horrible terrain also can't support those high speeds.