Last updated: December 18, 2009 - 9:31am
[Commentary] After almost a decade of relative silence from the Justice Department's antitrust division, the LA Times welcomes the Federal Trade Commission challenging how far a dominant company can go with discounts, incentives and penalties to hold on to its share of the market. The $1.25-billion settlement Intel reached last month with rival Advanced Micro Devices doesn't address Intel's pricing, just its exclusive deals with PC makers and retailers. Another important issue raised by the FTC's complaint is whether competition can be considered harmed if prices fall, as they have in chips. Just as the PC operating system is being overtaken by other technologies, though, so is the ground shifting under Intel. It has little sway over the markets for portable and mobile devices and not much presence in televisions, Blu-ray players and other increasingly intelligent devices in the living room. The commission is rightly concerned about companies extending their dominance unfairly from one market to another, but it needs to bear in mind how rapidly the computing world is changing.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Antirust Nominee Pressed on Monitoring Google's Behavior
- Intel reaches antitrust accord with FTC
- FTC Challenges Intel's Dominance of Worldwide Microprocessor Markets
- Administration Plans to Strengthen Antitrust Rules
- President Obama Taps Baer for Antitrust
- Antitrust battle will go on despite AMD-Intel settlement
- Brussels fines Intel record €1bn
- Varney Leaving Justice
- Intel in trouble
- Varney To Head DOJ's Antitrust Division
- FCC Names Antitrust Attorney to Head AT&T/T-Mobile Review
- Malone Fined $1.4 Million Over Discovery Share Buys
- In this antitrust slugfest, consumers always lose
- Justice Department Backs Limits on Wireless Companies
- Department of Justice Approves Google’s Acquisition of Motorola Mobility; Nortel Patent Deals
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

