Originally published: January 20, 2010
Last updated: November 29, 2010 - 11:32am
Amid the stampede in state and local government to establish accounts on Twitter and Facebook, there is a concern about transparency, a few government officials recently said.
That may seem counterintuitive, given that anyone can view Twitter or Facebook. But government transparency is more complicated. Citizens may expect agencies to produce and maintain archives of communications that leave a digital trail. For example, employees who receive voicemails via e-mail ought to make sure all of the voicemails they receive are fit for public ears. E-mails are considered public records under the Freedom of Information Act, and that includes voicemails attached to them. State and local CIOs are privately asking whether social media postings will need to be archived, too.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- San Francisco and Partnering Cities Launch 311 Open Source
- NTIA Launches Social Networking Presence, Restricts Employee Access
- Twitter and Government Transparency
- Anticipated Web 3.0 jibes with open-government goals
- Federal IT spending to increase almost 4 percent in fiscal 2010
- Twitter crackdown in Baltimore Circuit Court
- Obama Administration Continues to Adopt New Media
- Administration Launches Comprehensive Open Government Plan
- Google and Twitter team up to let Egyptians tweet by voicemail
- White House Names Open Government Leadership
- Why an Open Government Matters
- Evolving the Open Government Dashboard with You
- Army Orders Bases to Stop Blocking Twitter, Facebook, Flickr
- Charting a course from virtual reality to the White House
- Ugandan Government To Order Blocking of Facebook, Twitter To Quash Protests
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

