Originally published: January 28, 2010
Last updated: January 29, 2010 - 1:07pm
Broadcasters filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission promising "full and constructive participation" in the agency's National Broadband Plan. While offering support for several aspects of submissions filed by the Department of Justice and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the broadcast groups described a low-power proposal proffered by CTIA-The Wireless Association and the Consumer Electronics Association, while constructive, was impractical.
The broadcasters' comments came as part of a joint filing submitted by the National Association of Broadcasters and the Association for Maximum Service Television (MSTV). NAB and MSTV expressed appreciation for CTIA and CEA's "constructive" efforts, but concluded that their proposal to transition over-the-air digital television to a low-power distributed transmission system (DTS) technology would result in coverage loss and interference. "Coverage gaps are the unavoidable consequence of trying to use a fill-in technology such as DTS as an across-the-board substitute" for the current deliver system of over-the-air DTV, the broadcast groups explained. Moreover, the CTIA/CEA proposal drastically underestimates the cost burden associated with such a transition, while overestimating the spectrum yield, NAB and MSTV said. The costs of implementing DTS "would be orders of magnitude higher than the estimates provided by CTIA/CEA," broadcasters concluded.
Local Television Broadcasters said before meaningfully considering a reallocation of broadcast spectrum, the Commission should take the following six steps to build a solid foundation upon which proper spectrum policy framework can be constructed. 1. Complete a spectrum inventory and identify available spectrum; 2. Investigate spectrum shortage claims, and the nexus between spectrum and consumer broadband demand; 3. Investigate alternatives to reallocating spectrum to the wireless industry; 4. Investigate increasing reliance on over-the-air television; 5. Investigate adverse consequences of coercive reallocation schemes; and 6. Complete the DTV Transition for rural America. "The highest-valued use for spectrum will not come from government assessments or government interventions." Only competition and regulatory flexibility will advance the adoption of wireless broadband and the offering of fairly-priced wireless services.
Related Legislation
Related Topics
Special Topics
Location
Similar links
- Spectrum: Public trust or cash cow?
- The FCC National Broadband Plan: Long Haul Expected
- The FCC's Misguided Spectrum Quest
- Broadband Plan Calls for More Cash
- Boucher: No Forced Spectrum Removal
- Isakson Wants Hearings On Broadband; House GOP May Try to Kill Broadband Plan
- Mobile Broadband: A 21st Century Plan for U.S. Competitiveness, Innovation and Job Creation
- Broadcast Bullies?
- Stuart Benjamin: FCC Isn't Forcing Broadcasters Off Spectrum
- Why TV Needs To Keep Its Spectrum
- FCC: We're Not Picking Spectrum Winners, Losers
- Sen Snowe Digs Up 100 MHz of Unused Spectrum
- NAB: Government shouldn't pick winners, losers
- FCC Receives Comments on Broadcast TV Spectrum for Broadband
- Unleashing the Digital Television Band: A Proposal for an Overlay Auction
