Originally published: January 29, 2010
Last updated: November 29, 2010 - 11:33am
The one set of issues which demands a response is the assertion of AT&T regarding the public switched telephone network ("PSTN") that "[f]oremost on the Commission's agenda for enabling private investment to facilitate widespread deployment of broadband infrastructure should be the elimination of regulatory requirements that divert resources from broadband to the PSTN." Those regulations include carrier-of-last-resort ("COLR") regulations, unbundling requirements, and all federal support for the PSTN. Indeed, AT&T would do away with all state regulation of telephone service. The PSTN that AT&T claims is obsolete, is not disappearing. The key point that AT&T willfully ignores is that there are not two networks, one PSTN and one IP-enabled. They are both the same network.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- AT&T Tells FCC It's Time to Cut the Cord
- NASUCA: Consumer Experience Should Drive Definition of Broadband
- NASUCA Supports Using USF for Improving Broadband Affordability and Adoption
- FCC workshop participants: Interconnection critical to PSTN phase-out
- Why AT&T is full of it and why Google Voice is good for the consumer
- Definitive Answers Elude FCC Workshop on PSTN Phase-Out
- NASUCA Says Broadband Cannot Completely Replace Traditional Telephone Service
- Small telcos face uncertain future in post-PSTN world
- Fresh Wave of 2013 State Bills Seeks to Limit PUC VoIP, IP Regulation
- Consumers Paying Billions due to Misallocated Telecom Costs
- From POTS to…
- “The telephone network is obsolete”: Get ready for the all-IP telco
- Vint Cerf: Internet competition has “evaporated” since dial-up
- The Internet and the Public Switched Telephone Network -- Disparities, Differences, and Distinctions
- Beta Testing the Final Transition to IP Broadband
Topics
Location
Legislation
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

