Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:33am
INJUNCTION ISSUED AGAINST UTAH INTERNET CENSORSHIP LAW
[SOURCE: Center for Democracy and Technology]
A federal court in Utah has blocked enforcement of an Internet censorship bill that CDT, the American Civil Liberties Union, and a broad coalition of bookstores, independent artists and ISPs challenged as unconstitutional in 2005. The court entered a stipulated preliminary injunction that prevents the enforcement of statutory provisions amended by Utah House Bill 260 (including a vague "harmful-to-minors" provision as it might apply to Internet communications). The lawsuit argues that H.B. 260 is unconstitutional under the First Amendment and the Commerce Clause. The law would force web sites to remove lawful content from the Internet or face prosecution. It would also require ISPs to block access to adult sites in such a way that many innocent sites would likely also be blocked.
Injunction: http://www.cdt.org/speech/20060829utah.pdf
Original CDT Complaint (June 09, 2005): http://www.cdt.org/speech/utahwebblock/20050609hb260complaint.pdf
Related
- Court affirms Child Online Protection Act unconstitutional
- US neighborhood bookstores thrive in digital age
- Barnes & Noble Plans an Extensive E-Bookstore TO RIVAL AMAZON
- Net porn ban faces another legal setback
- Blocking social media access a ‘slippery path,’ civil liberties advocates say
- School District Told to Replace Web Filter Blocking Pro-Gay Sites
- E-Books, Shmee-Books: Readers Return to the Stores
- Network neutrality? Not at the coffee shop
- German Court Blocks Motorola’s iPhone Injunction
- FCC Must Protect Innovation, Privacy in e911 Rulemaking
- Reading is alive and increasingly electronic
- BART overreached when it blocked cell phone use
- Is there hope for small bookstores in a digital age?
- ACLU sues over blocked web sites
- House Passes Broad Mandatory Filtering Bill
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

