Stay connected:
Submitted: August 31, 2006 - 8:56am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:36am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:36am
"This is a very complicated bill, and it's outrageous that all these amendments were made in the last days and we never were allowed to see them," said Megan Taylor, spokeswoman for the League of California Cities. The carriers controlled the process so thoroughly, Taylor said, that "on amendments we would send over to the Legislature, we'd hear back, 'Sorry, but AT&T said no.'"
Links to Sources
Related
- Pay-TV Bill OKd by California State Senate
- Cities May Lose Power Over Cable TV
- RTDNA joins groups to oppose California bills
- How will Obama use new media?
- California assembly votes bill easing cable rules
- California lawmaker to present bill revoking cellphone unlocking ban
- BART admits halting cell service to stop protests
- Today's Quote 12.08.06
- Gov Haley Barbour pushes for online sales tax in farewell speech
- Price promises of backers of Wisconsin cable bill fall flat
- Your privacy, under attack
- Silicon Valley uses growing clout to kill a digital privacy bill
- North Carolina misses the municipal broadband benefits Kansas City gets with Google
- California state legislature approves Location Privacy Act
- Cellphone Users in US, Canada, Spain Pay Most
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.