Stay connected:
Submitted: August 31, 2006 - 8:56am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:36am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:36am
"This is a very complicated bill, and it's outrageous that all these amendments were made in the last days and we never were allowed to see them," said Megan Taylor, spokeswoman for the League of California Cities. The carriers controlled the process so thoroughly, Taylor said, that "on amendments we would send over to the Legislature, we'd hear back, 'Sorry, but AT&T said no.'"
Links to Sources
Related
- Pay-TV Bill OKd by California State Senate
- Cities May Lose Power Over Cable TV
- How will Obama use new media?
- California assembly votes bill easing cable rules
- BART admits halting cell service to stop protests
- Gov Haley Barbour pushes for online sales tax in farewell speech
- Price promises of backers of Wisconsin cable bill fall flat
- Today's Quote 12.08.06
- North Carolina misses the municipal broadband benefits Kansas City gets with Google
- Cellphone Users in US, Canada, Spain Pay Most
- Vermont's Governor Wants Entire State To Offer Free Wi-Fi By 2010
- Guess What's the Fastest-Adopted Gadget of the Last 50 Years
- New Firm Mines Its Polling Expertise
- Brodsky's Sham
- CA Legislative Public Database Monopolized by Government Agency
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.