Day 1 of the National Broadband Plan

Day 1 of the National Broadband Plan
Charles Benton

Charles Benton

March 16, 2010

To paraphrase poet Robert Burns,

"The best laid plans of mice and men
Go often askew,
And leave us nothing but grief and pain,
For promised joy!"

For weeks, the National Broadband Plan team at the Federal Communications Commission has operated under a clock counting down the days to today. But today, for all of us, is Day 1 of the National Broadband Plan. We will all scurry to absorb the conclusions and recommendations of the plan. And, tomorrow, we will -- we must -- roll up our sleeves to make sure we all enjoy the promise of truly universal, affordable broadband.

Later today, the FCC will release our first National Broadband Plan, the fruit of countless hours of work headed by Blair Levin, Erik Garr, and the Omnibus Broadband Initiative team. The Herculean effort to collect the data, analyze it and deliver the broadband plan in just over a year is truly amazing.

The promise of the plan is broadband access for all Americans, affordability, and maximum use of broadband to improve consumer welfare, civic participation, public safety and homeland security, community development, health care delivery, energy independence and efficiency, education, worker training, private sector investment, entrepreneurial activity, job creation and economic growth.

The plan is much anticipated. In January 2007, I called on then-President George Bush to create a national broadband strategy with set benchmarks, deployment timetables, a commitment to demand drivers, and measurable thresholds. Since that time, I've dedicated the Benton Foundation's efforts - both independently through our publication of An Action Plan for America and through coalitions like the U.S. Broadband Coalition and the Media and Democracy Coalition - to help us reach this day.

I am thrilled to read the FCC's plan. But as relieved as I am that the FCC has delivered the plan -- and fully cognizant of the incredible work done inside and outside the Commission to get us here -- let me be among the first to identify our new challenge: we must implement this plan - quickly - while evaluating our investments in broadband to inform our next national broadband plan.

The plan sets us on a new telecommunications course, but only if it is acted upon. I trust, to some degree, that the momentum within the FCC will launch a number of proceedings to make good on some of the recommendations in the plan. And the leadership from the White House will likely press for change with in the Executive Branch. But we will need to keep up the pressure, especially on Congress, to transform the plan into new, effective policy.

Congress will be key in transforming the Universal Service Fund -- historically devoted mainly to supporting affordable telephony connections -- into a springboard for expanding broadband availability and use. Congress must also be engaged if we are to both identify and make available new swaths of spectrum to fulfill our growing mobile communications needs -- especially for public safety.

Some may balk at the expansiveness of the plan and the FCC's calls for additional spending. Others may say that there is no need to enact this plan, that the marketplace alone will deliver the high-speed networks and services we need to improve people's lives. But the plan is exactly what Congress called for and the law requires. Our over-reliance on the marketplace to date has left us with gaping divides between people with the access and skills they need to make effective use of today's most powerful communications tools and those who don't. We embark on implementing this plan so that each of us - no matter our income, education, ethnicity or age - have the opportunity to fully participate in our society.

Congress also called for the FCC to evaluate the deployment of broadband in the US - including the progress of Recovery Act-funded broadband stimulus projects. Although the FCC today delivers a snapshot of broadband deployment around the country, the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program and Broadband Initiatives Program projects are just getting off the ground.

To honestly appraise the effectiveness of these community broadband investments, the FCC, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Rural Utilities Service should commit now to collect the right data, organize it and make it publicly available according to the latest methods from information science and community informatics. Done right, this data could contribute to real time adjustment, refinement, correction and recalibration of these projects to ensure success.

In addition, the experience of these projects could inform the coming reform of the Universal Service Fund and offer the data needed to inform future investment in broadband deployment. Those are incredibly high stakes that will impact our nation's ability to compete economically against global competitors, to increase our energy efficiency, to improve educational outcomes, and to achieve the promise of high-quality, affordable healthcare.

Let us not let the National Broadband Plan go askew. Every stakeholder - and, as FCC Commissioner Michael Copps often points out, that is all of us - must gear up to make today's plan a reality.

Comments

Is it me.. or does anyone else feel that there MAY.. just may be other things our politicians might consider working on first? Might there be SOMETHING more important requiring the time, energy and research of our politicians?!
We're at war.. and close to a second major conflict. We have many Americans losing their homes. Banks collapsing. The FDIC (our "savings insurance" is $20 BILLION dollars in the hole). Huge unemployment. Polluted water and skies. And somehow providing Billybob in Athens, Ohio (who has "herd of that inranet thing") need 100 mbps of wireless bandwidth is critical to our government. For pete's sake.. it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that politicians are being swayed by big companies with nothing short of "payola" and "favors" to start an initiative like this.

Other political commentaries have included "we need to teach people about the internet and computers, and they will need wireless broadband". WHO makes this decision?? We've had libraries since the country was founded, but I don't recall any initiative to get every American a library card or take a set of encyclopedias to every American door by door. Maybe 5% of Americans ever went to a library. Yet somehow the politicians are saying "we have to get wireless broadband to the entire U.S.". Hey, if we are all telling our politicians "priority #1 is wireless broadband" as a majority, then hey, what do I know. But this initiative is coming out of Washington and supported by big business.

And the people who are "out in the boonies"... do you think they have any interest or desire to pay AT&T or Verizon (or whoever) $100 per month for wireless broadband. In Ohio, 10% of the population doesn't have cable TV or satellite (and that is by choice or financial reasons). In Texas that number is over 20%. So we take away a free service (advertiser supported TV), and we think they are going to pay for wireless internet. Anybody actually ask these people: Do you want it? Would you pay for it? DO YOU HAVE A COMPUTER??

I, for one (and I surely can't be alone) feel that the government MUST focus on existing problems and core issues affecting all Americans everyday and not start some new initiative that we aren't even asking for. Before wireless across the nation, I'd rather see incentives to communications companies for fiber to every house. And 100 mbps is fine today, but so was 24.4k fifteen years ago.. then 56k.. so what happens in 10 years when we each need 1 gig of bandwidth.. or 10 gig?? Then what? Who's spectrum does the FCC take then? What about the limitation of wireless then?

And finally, I'm not overly thrilled with flooding the air with even more RF radiation. Right now there are about 4,200 TV stations in the US (1800 full power / 2300 low power). To cover the U.S with broadband internet would require every PC based device to have a transceiver (transmitter and receiver), and a network (like cell towers) covering the entire US (minimum number would be at least 50,000 assuming 1,000 per state). Already it seems like it's not a matter of IF a person gets cancer, but WHEN and WHAT TYPE of cancer they'll get. And we want to add more RF radiation across the entire U.S. (And our governement feels adding wireless internet is more important than cleaning up our environment or maybe even finding a cure for cancer?!).

You hopefully see my point here. The "Cliff Notes": Politicians, Don't you have something more important to do for those who elected you than starting some initiative. I promise you this. I can't imagine 1% of the U.S. population voted for any of you with the idea of "he/she will make sure I have wireless broadband internet"! Hey politicians, STOP pissing around with something you know nothing about and instead focus half that effort on our pollution, our economy, our ecology, our "war problems", our unemployed, our hungry, our homeless. Any of THESE items seem to be a cause worth fighting for? Or is the REAL ISSUE and problem that we need wireless 100 mbps across our nation??!!

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!

Submitted by DallasD on March 17, 2010 - 10:04am.