Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:43am
CALIFORNIA CITIES SEEK A VETO FOR VIDEO BILL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
California cities and counties, concerned that a new statewide video-franchising bill will disenfranchise groups of consumers throughout the state, have launched an effort to get Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to veto the bill. The municipalities and their advocacy group, the League of California Cities, strongly opposed the bill throughout the hearing process. Local regulators stressed their support for competition, but said they fear the bill (approved Aug. 31) will allow new providers, including telcos Verizon and AT&T, to geographically “cherry-pick†the state. Gov Schwarzenegger has already wielded his veto power this session, spiking a controversial bill that would have changed the education code to extend protections against anti-gay speech in schools. But bill watchers don't anticipate that he will stand in the way of state franchising.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6370091.html?display=Top+Stories
Related
- After Ind., Franchise Battle Shifts to N.J.
- Verizon Gets Statewide Franchise in California
- Verizon Still in Local Calif. Franchise Talks
- California OKs Statewide-Franchise Rules
- PA Statewide-Franchise Bills Move Forward
- Fla. Statewide-Franchise Bill Heads to Gov
- Illinois Gov. Signs Franchise Law
- The State Video-Franchise Bill Report Card
- California Taps Telecom Panel
- Nevada Franchise-Reform Bill Heads to Gov
- Franchise Bills Dominate State Debates
- Pay-TV Bill OKd by California State Senate
- Michigan Passes Bill On Video-Franchising
- Operators Opt For Calif. Oversight
- Texas-Sized Fight Over Law
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

