Originally published: April 13, 2010
Last updated: April 13, 2010 - 9:12pm
The US ambassador to Australia on Tuesday questioned the logic behind the local government's plan to begin censoring its citizens' access to certain Web content, stressing the Internet "needs to be free."
Australian officials have long defended their proposed online filter as the most effective way to combat objectionable Web content, including child pornography. But US ambassador Jeff Bleich told the Sydney Morning Herald this week that there are other, less controversial methods at the country's disposal that would allow law enforcement to catch sex offenders without also censoring the Internet. "[The United States has] been able to accomplish the goals that Australia has described, which is to capture and prosecute child pornographers ... without having to use Internet filters," he told the newspaper.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Australia bows to complaints, delays 'Net filter for a year
- Google, Yahoo object to proposed Internet censorship in Australia
- Foes say Google got slap on the wrist in Wi-Spy
- Australian ISPs Impose Voluntary Filters
- Government to protect Australian content on commercial television
- State Department: No action 'needed' to counter Iran's alleged censorship of Google, other social media
- China Imposes New Internet Controls
- Huawei set to miss out on Australia network
- How China and Others Are Altering Web Traffic
- Australia condemns 'irresponsible' Wikileaks cable leak
- Obama Committed to Network Neutrality (Updated)
- Sen DeMint: Government Should Free Media to Innovate
- China Faces Criticism Over New Software Censor
- Companies Pledge Not to Help Pakistan Filter the Web
- Facebook, Google to Stand Trial in India
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

