Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 3:52am
STATE AGs SPEAK OUT AGAINST FEDERAL PRE-EMPTION IN TELECOM-REFORM BILL
[SOURCE: RCRWirelessNews, AUTHOR: Jeffrey Silva]
Forty one state attorneys general asked Congress to strip from telecom-reform legislation provisions that would pre-empt state regulation of wireless and Voice over Internet Protocol services, pointing to mounting complaints and lack of enforcement muscle at the Federal Communications Commission. "This unwarranted action pre-empts states from taking proactive action to prevent industry practices which have caused substantial harm to our citizens, and with no effective federal protection to fill the void that will be created via this pre-emption," stated officials who signed onto a Sept. 14 National Association of Attorneys General letter to Congress. The state AGs said telecom act pre-emption could hinder efforts—such as the 2004 settlement agreements among 32 state attorneys general and three national wireless carriers and California’s $12 million fine against Cingular Wireless L.L.C.—to safeguard consumers and punish abuses.
http://rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=27324
See the letter:
http://www.naag.org/news/pdf/20060915.WirelessPreemption.pdf
Links to Sources
Related
- Democrat Advances Throw off Wireless Issues
- State Groups Fight Pre-Emption For Wireless Industry In Telecom Bill
- Faltering Telecom Bill May Spur FCC Action On Video Services
- Wireless lobbies for Preemption as Senate Wrangles with Telecom Reform
- Congress ends with a Flurry of Legislation
- Telecom Tax Restrictions seen Hurting Local Governments
- Alaska's Stevens Left Out In The Cold
- It's Inouye's Turn to set the Telecom Agenda
- Congress Unlikely to Tackle Net Neutrality
- States' Right-of-Way
- Today's Quote 11.14.06
- Elections, Net Neutrality May Disconnect Telecom Bill
- "Internet Watch List" Identifies Dangerous Legislation
- Justice Dept. defends mandatory Web-labeling bill
- Phone firms' TV market bid may skip Congress
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

