Last updated: February 20, 2008 - 11:16pm
[Commentary] Last week, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that the mayor there expects a legal challenge from Internet service providers like SBC and Comcast, who presumably prefer every San Franciscan to pay a monthly access fee. Obviously, ISPs fear competition from a free service. But people pay for bottled water, music downloads, open-source operating systems and printed versions of free blogs. Companies can still make money in cities with public Wi-Fi by selling even faster service or bundling connectivity with subscriptions, software or support. Without legislation, ISPs have no legal basis for stopping community Wi-Fi. But legislation is a distinct possibility. The city of Philadelphia, for example, almost had to scrap its Wi-Fi plan when the state governor threatened to sign a bill barring cities from providing Internet service for a fee.
[SOURCE: Wired News, AUTHOR: Jennifer Granick, Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society]
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,69175,00.html
Links to Sources
Related
- New Orleans' free Wi-Fi in dispute
- Verizon Launches Free Wi-Fi Service for Customers
- Let the experts run citywide WiFi
- Experts debate municipal Wi-Fi efforts
- This is why Wi-Fi
- Google a victim of EarthLink woes with cancellation of S.F. Wi-Fi
- SF Board delays vote on free Wi-Fi
- The Economics Of Metro Wi-Fi
- Earthlink to Build Philadelphia's Wireless Net
- Meraki proposes free Wi-Fi network for S.F.
- Free Wi-Fi Still an Elusive Goal
- Google, EarthLink submit S.F. WiFi plan
- Wi-Not? South Korea's Seoul To Blanket The City With Free Wi-Fi
- Verizon changes tune on Wi-Fi
- Make free wi-fi truly free
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

