Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:09am
JON STEWART AS SUBSTANTIVE AS NETWORK NEWS
[SOURCE: Indiana University press release]
Which would you think has more substantive news coverage -- traditional broadcast network newscasts or The Daily Show with Jon Stewart? Would you believe the answer is neither? Julia R. Fox, assistant professor of telecommunications at Indiana University isn't joking when she says the popular "fake news" program, which last week featured Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf as a guest, is just as substantive as network coverage. While much has been written in the media about The Daily Show's impact, Fox's study is the first scholarly effort to systematically examine how the comedy program compares to traditional television news as sources of political information. The study, "No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign," will be published next summer by the Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, published by the Broadcast Education Association.
http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/4159.html
Links to Sources
Related
- Informed by Colbert and Stewart?
- Is "The Daily Show" 'News'?
- Stewart, ESPN and "Mad Men" Drive Cable
- Jon Stewart Hails Newspapers' Campaign Coverage -- Hits Cable News
- Stewart, Cramer TV battle royal draws big audience
- How Different Media Have Covered the General Election
- How 9-11 Changed the Evening News
- Is fake news now the standard?
- Key News Audiences Now Blend Online and Traditional Sources
- In News Coverage, Tea Party and Its 'New Personalities' Hold the Spotlight
- Jon Stewart Most Trusted Newscaster in America
- 'Liberal bias?' IU professors find network TV election coverage favors Republicans
- TV's Low-Cal Campaign Coverage
- Local Broadcasters' Quiet Consolidation
- CNBC Thrives as Hosts Deliver News With Attitude
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

