Originally published: June 14, 2010
Last updated: June 14, 2010 - 9:21pm
Should the poor have cell phones?
It's a question that has engaged both ends of the political spectrum since 2004, when the conservative Heritage Foundation published a controversial paper saying the poor enjoy "high living standards" and cited as proof that many have cell phones, among other things. In rebuttal, advocates for the poor have argued that cell phones are not luxuries but necessities, as basic to modern life as electricity. Complicating the debate these days is a new development: free cell phones for the poor and working poor distributed by a Miami wireless company. They're paid for, in part, by charges on phone bills that the federal government allows carriers to levy. It's a little-known collaboration between the federal government and phone carriers, devised by the Reagan administration 26 years ago.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Subsidized Cell Phones Provide Significant Economic Gains for Poor and Near-Poor Americans
- Internet access shouldn't be limited by income
- Broadband Pilot Programs for Low-Income Consumers (updated)
- Poor in Colorado may get free cell phones
- Free cellphone program for the poor draws critics
- Access to web, phones key to helping the poor: LeWeb
- For the poor, cellphones can offer lifeline
- Group says Comcast's Internet program for the poor needs work
- Verizon Florida agrees to refunds for customers
- Keeping Low-Income Consumers in Mind While Reviewing the Verizon Spectrum Buy
- From the Benton Blog: FCC’s Low-Income Phone Reform Needs to Connect and Tie Eligibility to People, Not Housing
- What the iPhone 4S Says about Inequality
- Free Cell Phone Service for the Poor
- Keeping Low-Income Consumers in Mind While Reviewing the Verizon Spectrum Buy
- FCC’s Low-Income Phone Reform Needs to Connect and Tie Eligibility to People, Not Housing
Related Events
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

