The Battle Is Raging for Control of the Internet -- and Big Corporations May Come Out on the Losing Side
Originally published: June 22, 2010
Last updated: June 22, 2010 - 3:55pm
[Commentary] A battle is raging for control of the Internet and it is not taking place in Washington. Scores of cities, fed up with the recalcitrance and outright arrogance of their providers and Washington's lack of action are taking their information future into their own hands by building their own high-speed networks.
The vast majority of cities with municipally owned networks didn't want to get into the telecommunications business. But after being spurned by the private sector they built their own networks and have found that a public network has many advantages. Ownership allows communities to establish the rules that will play a large part in determining their economic futures. The success of these public networks has spurred the interest of hundreds of communities big and small, and the implacable opposition of the telecommunication companies that now monopolize the Internet's future.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Why Is Mighty Time Warner So Scared of Tiny Salisbury, NC?
- Map shows co-ops lead charge on rural broadband
- Comcast vs. Community: The Future of Broadband Competition
- Public ownership of broadband access is best
- Publicly Owned Broadband Networks: Averting the Looming Broadband Monopoly
- New Report Concludes: To Be Competitive, Cities Must Own High Speed Information Networks
- What's the Future of Municipal Wi-Fi?
- Web War: Nothing Neutral About It
- The Battle for Broadband
- Cities themselves may be muni Wi-Fi's savior
- EarthLink Exiting Wi-Fi Business; Problems in Phil
- Municipal fiber needs more FDR localism, fewer state bans
- Why US Tech Policy Needs Silicon Valley's Input
- Cities Cut Wireless Chat, Build
- How to untangle the San Francisco wireless debate
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

