Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:19am
"The evidence is overwhelmingly clear that further relaxation or elimination of media ownership limits by the FCC is not in the public interest," says study author Dr. Mark Cooper, Director of Research, Consumer Federation of America, another MDC member. "This research, taken together with the FCC's own research that it suppressed, proves that media concentration in local markets, consolidation into national chains, and conglomeration across media types all harm localism and diversity in local news markets. Local TV stations and local daily newspapers continue to be the dominant sources of local news and the most influential by far. The Internet is not a significant source of local news. In fact, the few who go online for local news frequently surf to the web sites of the local TV station or the local daily newspaper. The misguided rules the FCC proposed are simply out of touch with these facts."
Links to Sources
Related
- Today's Quote 10.03.07
- Today's Quote 10.25.07
- Another TV duopoly is a bad idea in Miami
- Today's Quote 11.06.06
- Local TV news doesn't share the public interest
- Prometheus radio comes out against XM/Sirius merger
- Groups Weigh In to FCC on Media Ownership
- Third Circuit Remands Newspaper-Broadcast Rule Change to FCC (Updated)
- A Consumer View on the FCC's New Consolidation Rule
- FCC Gets Flurry of Media Ownership Studies
- Tribune keeps Fighting TV, Newspaper Ownership Ban
- The Future of Journalism Is Not in the Past
- Commissioner Clyburn Not Sold on FCC Spectrum Recommendations
- Critics Turn Out To Protest Media Consolidation
- Reports show Future looks Strong for Media
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

