Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:20am
PLANTED PROPAGANDA
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] The Defense Department inspector general has concluded that having a Pentagon contractor secretly pay Iraqi journalists and news organizations to run positive news stories about the war doesn't violate any laws or regulations. It's almost impossible to tell whether that conclusion is correct: The scanty, two-page summary released by the Pentagon provides no details about the activities of the contractor, the Lincoln Group, the contract under which it was operating or the applicable rules. Assuming the inspector general's legal assessment is right, it only makes the problem worse. The U.S. government has a legitimate interest in conveying its point of view. The problem is when it does so in secret. The government shouldn't be in the business of covertly peddling propaganda -- especially in a war based on the notion of seeking to export democratic values such as, say, a free press.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/22/AR2006102200703.html
(requires registration)
Related
- DOD Rescinds Report That Found No Evidence Of Pundit Propaganda
- Halt Pentagon Payments To Iraqi Journos, DoD Report Recommends
- Planted Articles May Be Violation
- U.S. Military Covertly Pays to Run Stories in Iraqi Press
- All the propaganda that's fit to print
- Inspector General Sees No Misdeeds in Pentagon's Effort to Make Use of TV Analysts
- Most think propaganda campaign in Iraq wrong
- The Generals' Second Careers
- Congressmen Urge Probe of Defense Dept.’s Influence on Military Analysts
- Pundit Inquiry Result Still Pending At FCC
- Pentagon May Have Mixed Propaganda With PR
- No Breach Seen in Work in Iraq on Propaganda
- Senator Seeks Answers on Iraq Stories
- Misinformation campaign targets USA TODAY reporter, editor
- Attack on White House Propaganda
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

