Submitted: October 31, 2006 - 9:17am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:28am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:28am
WHEN IS ENTERTAINMENT TOO POLITICAL?
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Ira Teinowitz]
As the hubbub mounts over negative political ads, another controversy is emerging over what should count as political advocacy on TV and what is entertainment. Just this week, a Democratic candidate for governor of California challenged an appearance by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on "The Tonight Show" as being akin to a political ad, and broadcast networks rejected an ad for a documentary film about the Dixie Chicks for being too political.
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=112814
Links to Sources
Related
- Band's Film Ads Hit Sour Note
- With Keystone State Now a Key State, Spend Soars
- Broadcast TV Ratings Start to Strain
- Fairness Doctrine hammered 309-115
- Teens Who Attend Most Movies Also Consume Most Media
- Industry Looks for Better TV Audience Measurement
- 100 Leading Media Companies Revenue Hits $268 Billion
- Study: More Money, More Media Coverage Lead to More Negative Political Ads
- Imus Mess Makes Arbiters of Advertisers | Americans Support Firing
- Forward Into Battle
- Meg Whitman won't agree to abandon negative ads
- After Slow Start, Republicans Blanket Iowa With Ads
- Occupy Wall Street Fuels Economic Coverage
- TV ad-buying season could get confusing this year
- The End of Network News as We Know It?
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

