Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:29am
HEAVY COVERAGE AT MIDTERM FAVORS DEMOCRATS, STUDY SAYS
[SOURCE: USAToday, AUTHOR: Peter Johnson]
Network news coverage has favored Democratic candidates in the midterm election, and the page scandal involving former congressman Mark Foley has been the main story line, drawing almost as much coverage as Iraq and terrorism combined, a new study finds. An analysis by the Center for Media and Public Affairs of midterm election stories aired on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts Sept. 5-Oct. 22 found that 2006's coverage has been almost five times as heavy as in the 2002 midterm elections: 167 stories, compared with 35 four years ago. The study found that three out of four evaluations of Democratic candidates' chances of winning -- such as sound bites -- were positive, compared with one out of eight for Republicans. Coverage has been dominated by two major themes: the effects of the Foley scandal, and the impact the Bush presidency is having on the party's congressional candidates.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/life/20061031/d_mediamix31.art.htm
Related
- Young People Turn to the Web for News
- Mainstream, new media getting a weekly checkup
- O'Donnell's Delaware Stunner Drives Election Coverage
- Media, government duel in 'perfect storm'
- Katrina could Forever Change how TV News Covers Storms
- Media Coverage of the Clergy Abuse Scandal
- Press Coverage of the Character of the candidates is Highly Negative
- The Media Roar into the Midterms
- How Social and Traditional Media Differ in Treatment of Conventions and Beyond
- The Obama Infatuation
- Ranking Election 2010 Newsmakers
- At CBS News, investigative reporting gets a higher profile
- As His Sirius Show Begins, Radio Ponders the Stern Effect
- Cablevision overwhelmingly favors Democrats
- Democrats increasingly go negative in midterm ads
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

