Originally published: August 13, 2010
Last updated: August 14, 2010 - 6:17pm
Verizon told the Federal Communications Commission that reclassifying broadband transmissions as a telecommunications service subject to some Title II common carrier regulations would cause "widespread harm to the Internet ecosystem."
And besides, it said, it would be illegal. Even worse, said the wireless company, if the FCC imposed those regulations on wireless broadband. Verizon said that regulation proponents have overestimated the ease with which the FCC could just change its mind and reverse its conclusion that Internet access was an integrated information service subject to light-touch Title I regulations. Verizon put in a plug for the policy framework it has teamed with Google to tout. "Targeted legislation of this kind is the best way to strike an appropriate balance that protects consumers and promotes continued innovation and investment, while foregoing unnecessary and harmful regulation," said Verizon.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- AT&T: FCC's 'Third Way' Would Be Road To Ruin
- FCC’s Genachowski Tells Congress He Will Consider Closing Title II Docket
- On Defining the Third Way
- Coming To Terms With Title II
- On Defining the Third Way
- Greene, Upton Want Congress To Weigh In Before FCC Reclassifies Broadband
- Free Press: Third Way Is the Right Way
- Reclassifying Broadband as a Title II Telecommunications Service: A Legal and Policy Assessment
- ACA to FCC: Reclassifying Broadband Without NPRM Violates Law
- The National Broadband Plan Needs the Third Way
- Paths to preserving an open Internet
- Restoring FCC Authority to Make Broadband Policy: A Way Forward After Comcast v. FCC
- Saturday Broadband Reclassification Bill Meeting Held
- FCC and Title II: All Options Said To Be Still On Table
- ACA to FCC: Third Way Would Be Big Burden
National Broadband Plan
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

