Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:49am
BRITISH JUNK-FOOD AD BAN ROCKS TV BUSINESS
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Emma Hall]
Marketers and media owners are counting the cost following U.K. regulator Ofcom's surprise decision to end junk-food advertising to all children under 16. Under the ban, U.K. media owners could lose $75 million in ad revenue in 2007. Hardest-hit will be the dedicated children's channels, which will lose up to 15% of ad revenue. For all commercial broadcasters, the lost ads represent up to 0.7% of their income, according to Ofcom's own calculations. Ofcom's ruling includes a total ban on advertising foods high in fat, salt and sugar (referred to as HFSS), not only around children's programming but also in youth-oriented and adult programs which attract a lot of viewers under 16. Many of the marketers involved have voluntarily stopped targeting young children in recent years, and moved their campaigns onto youth channels such as MTV, believing they were safe in targeting teenagers.
http://adage.com/article?article_id=113444
Links to Sources
Related
- Hollywood Can't Kick the Junk-Food Habit
- FTC: No Rise In Junk-Food Ads
- Promoting Nutrition, Disney to Restrict Junk-Food Ads
- Martin: FCC May Need To Regulate Food Ads
- NBC, Telemundo to Cut Snack Ads from Educational Kids’ Shows
- Activists Plan to Sue Viacom and Kellogg Over Ads to Children
- Selling Junk Food to Toddlers
- Markey, Tate Respond to 11 Pledges Limiting Junk Food Ads to Kids
- Mickey Holds Health Banner High
- Disney Takes On Obesity
- How Kellogg Ignored Warning Signs of Food Lawsuit
- Consumer Groups Lobby to Remove Ads from Schools
- Disney Junk-Food Ban Is Seen Costing It Less Than $7.2 Million
- Kellogg Move Bodes Ill for Ads to Kids
- Crying Foul over Online Junk Food Marketing
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

