Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 4:53am
RAIDING YOUR INBOX
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] In the latest illustration of the Bush administration's disregard for your privacy, the Justice Department is trying to convince a panel of federal judges that the FBI should be free to read your e-mail without obtaining a warrant. It's not all your e-mail -- only messages left on a Web-based system such as Hotmail or on your Internet service provider's computers. A 1986 law forbids the interception and disclosure of e-mail and other online transmissions without a warrant. But there is an exception. If the messages are more than 180 days old, they can be obtained merely with a subpoena or a court order, which investigators can obtain more easily than a warrant. The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals should rein in the feds and strike down the provisions of the law that are out of sync with the technological realities of the broadband era -- and the privacy expectations of Americans.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-ed-email01dec01,1,5868619.story?coll=la-news-a_section
(requires registration)
Related
- First wiretapping, now letter-opening?
- The cloud and the future of the Fourth Amendment
- Librarians Say Surveillance Bills Lack Adequate Oversight
- Judge Declares Law Governing Warrantless Cellphone Tracking Unconstitutional
- Wise-up intelligence
- House OKs Expanded Wiretap Program
- Bush denies Spying Infringing on Americans' Privacy
- Canada wants warrantless Internet spying, says critics support child porn
- The shocking strangeness of our 25-year-old digital privacy law
- Your boss shouldn't read your text or e-mail messages without an OK, court says
- Secret Orders Target Email
- How Frictionless Sharing Could Undermine Your Legal Right to Privacy
- Bush Is Not Above the Law
- Appeals court: Feds need warrants for e-mail
- The secret life of your cellphone
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

