Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 5:19am
NEWSPAPER-TV MARRIAGE SHOWS SIGNS OF STRAIN
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens]
Television once was a coveted partner of newspapers. Executives talked of synergy between the two media, with newspaper reporters broadcasting their expertise on television, and TV stations providing a wider reach for the print brand. The high profit earned by TV stations, as much as 40 percent during years when the stations are fattened by political advertising, was seen as crucial to the bottom lines of newspaper companies. But even though TV stations still are profitable, they no longer enjoy the dominance they did in days before cable and the Internet. And in many places, the newspaper and television cultures never meshed. Television has not provided the hoped-for advertising relationships, either. Increasingly, newspapers are turning instead to the Web to help them land national advertisers. What happened to spoil the newspaper-television marriage? Mostly, the YouTube and MySpace interlopers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002408.html
(requires registration)
Related
- Tribune Co. Rejects Consortium Inquiry About Baltimore Sun
- At Wall Street Journal, Change of Accents
- Newspapers Know No End To Turmoil
- Tribune Empire Could Crumble
- Upton Proposes Ownership Changes
- The Media Ownership Endgame
- Cross-Ownership Muddies Tribune Sale
- Tribune keeps Fighting TV, Newspaper Ownership Ban
- Media Ownership Update 11.18.07
- Broadcasters, Newspapers Encourage FCC To Reform Media Ownership
- Consider: One Market, One master Control
- As FCC Digs Into Ownership, Big Media No Longer Cares
- The Winds of Change
- Seattle Media Ownership Hearing recap
- Six-Figure Fines For Four-Letter Words Worry Broadcasters
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

