Submitted: November 12, 2010 - 9:22am
Last updated: November 12, 2010 - 9:23am
Last updated: November 12, 2010 - 9:23am
Source:
New York Times
Author:
Editorial staff
Location:
Supreme Court of the United States, One First Street, NE, Washington, DC, United States
[Commentary] If the Supreme Court renders justice in a case it heard this month, Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association, it will strike down a California law barring the sale or rental of violent video games to anyone under 18. That would end a violation of free expression — but not prevent the states from finding other ways to support parents who do not want their children to play violent games. Restricting the content of games would mean adding to the short list of expression excluded from the First Amendment's protection.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Looking At Violent Video Games Now, Seeing Indecency In The Future
- Ruling on violent video games: Score one for 1st Amendment
- California appeals video game law to Supreme Court
- Entertainment industry opposes California video-game law
- Supreme Court lifts limits on sale of violent video games to minors
- Protecting kids from violent video games parents' responsibility
- It’s Perverse, but It’s Also Pretend
- Judging video games
- Supreme Court questions ban on sale of violent video games
- Dueling Commentary on California Video Game Law
- The high court’s misguided decision on violent video games
- Good intentions, bad law
- What next after Supreme Court ruling on violent video games?
- California's video game law ruled unconstitutional
- Video Games and Free Speech
Location
Javascript is required to view this map.
Ratings
Recommendation:
2
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

