Last updated: November 16, 2010 - 9:37am
[Commentary] Federal courts have long agreed that federal agents guarding the borders do not need a warrant or probable cause to search a traveler's belongings. That exception to the Fourth Amendment needs updating and tightening to reflect the realities of the digital age.
The government has a sovereign right and responsibility to secure the borders. The recent discovery of two powerful package bombs being shipped to the United States is a reminder of the many dangers out there. There is also a big difference between government agents scanning items for explosives or looking through a suitcase full of clothing, and searching through the hard drive of a laptop computer containing work papers, financial records, e-mail messages and Web site visits.
Congress should approve legislation along the lines of the Travelers' Privacy Protection Act proposed two years ago in the Senate. It would have confined border laptop searches involving American citizens and residents to situations where agents have a reasonable suspicion of illegal activity and require a higher standard of probable cause and a warrant or court order when a laptop is held for more than 24 hours. The measure also set strict limits on disclosure and sharing of information from devices seized at the border and requires the Department of Homeland Security to report regularly to Congress and the public on its search policies and practices.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- New lawsuit to challenge laptop searches
- Border agents limit confiscation of laptops
- ACLU Details Electronic Searches
- FBI Still Struggling With Supreme Court's GPS Ruling
- ACLU files lawsuit on border laptop searches
- Law enforcement and cellphone searches
- Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches
- When the Police Go Through Your Email: Quirk of Search Law Sets Off Alarm Bells
- Sen Leahy introduces update to electronic privacy law
- Appeals court guts landmark computer privacy ruling
- Supreme Court appears troubled by police use of GPS tracking without warrants
- Today's Quote
- Appeals court: Feds need warrants for e-mail
- Bipartisan coalition opposes warrantless electronic tracking by government
- Cops, ACLU clash over GOP bill that would limit cellphone tracking
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

