Originally published: November 23, 2010
Last updated: November 23, 2010 - 8:46pm
[Commentary] For 2012, how about the media actually doing something honest, and show a tincture of integrity? That is, state that it will no longer cover anyone or their activities if they do not sit down for interviews with that individual organ of media, and actually answer questions.
If they just recite their talking points, it does not count. They have to engage and answer follow-up questions for it to be a real interview. 2010 was an experiment. Radical righties running for Congress avoided questioning, preferring to put out their lies. The media complained... but covered. So, these righties got the best of both worlds -- no difficult questions but lots of free press and airtime. The media provided them legitimacy without having to demonstrate anything.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- The Boys on Le Bus: Foreign Press Mines Local Angles in US Primary
- paidContent 2012: At The Crossroads
- SOPA becoming election liability for backers
- 3 Marketing Mega Trends For 2012
- A Host Dials Down, and Bush Speaks Up
- Interviews, Going the Way of the Linotype?
- Fox News Host Is Scrutinized for Her Ties to Candidate
- 2012: The mobile web election
- Presidential Race Leads the News
- CBS Sidesteps Questions About Editing Of McCain Interview
- YouTube Interview with FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski
- What Private Entities Should Qualify for Stimulus Dollars? It's Easy.
- Romney says ‘vast left-wing conspiracy’ in media is attacking him
- 2012: The Year of Meaningful Use
- Increasingly, Reporters Must First Answer Some Questions
Topics
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

