Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 5:28am
HOLD OFF ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Profs David Farber and Michael Katz]
[Commentary] Network Neutrality restrictions would prohibit practices that could increase the value of the Internet for customers. Blocking premium pricing in the name of neutrality might have the unintended effect of blocking the premium services from which customers would benefit. No one would propose that the U.S. Postal Service be prohibited from offering Express Mail because a "fast lane" mail service is "undemocratic." Yet some current proposals would do exactly this for Internet services. We should wait until there is a problem before rushing to enact solutions.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801508.html
(requires registration)
Related
- Google hopes Rules aid Network Neutrality Effort
- Barton Rejects Net Neutrality Concerns
- Sorry AT&T, Title II Would Not "Require" Paid Prioritization
- No free lunches on the Net
- Economics and the Network Neutrality Debate
- House Passes COPE
- Why the White House is backing away from Network Neutrality?
- Keep Internet free, fast
- FCC, Broadband Providers Hold More Broadband Reclassification Talks
- Net neutrality not so neutral
- Network Neutrality and Bank of America’s charges
- Debate heats up over Net neutrality
- Surfers should pay congestion charges
- Get What You Pay For
- Self-Appointed Traffic Cop
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

