Originally published: December 14, 2010
Last updated: December 14, 2010 - 7:15pm
[Commentary] I wouldn't want to be in Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski’s position as the Dec. 21 deadline for a network neutrality order nears.
It’s an unenviable position as he tries to balance demands for an open Internet with the need for some sort of “prioritization” or “discrimination” for network operators in need of sustainable business models. He knows that his name will be inextricably tied to whatever this order ultimately says and strives to do, and he knows many broadband operators are ready to pounce with lawsuits if regulations go beyond the basics to which they reluctantly agreed (e.g., transparency and arbitrary blocking). He'll no doubt land in federal court whether or not there is a reclassification of broadband as a “Title II” communications service as network operators struggle to manage their networks, and as net-neutrality advocates push for continued openness of both fixed Internet and mobile infrastructures.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- FCC Open Meeting (December)
- FCC Chairman Genachowski: Dec. 21 Net Neutrality Vote "Essential"
- FCC Chairman Sets Broadband Regulation Framework
- Network Neutrality Bill Gives FCC No New Rulemaking Power
- FCC's New Net Neutrality Plan: Has Anything Changed?
- Senators push FCC to vote on network neutrality in 2010
- FCC's McDowell against reclassification, citing courts
- Swing vote Copps reiterates Title II support
- Rep Blackburn Makes Pre-emptive Attack on FCC Network Neutrality Order
- The Network Neutrality Order: Possible Adequacy, But No Regulatory Certainty Any Time Soon
- Net Neutrality Talks Move Forward With Tacit FCC Support
- Verizon, AT&T split on approach to FCC
- Net Neutrality End Run
- The time for compromise has passed on network neutrality
- The Battle over Net Neutrality is Over: The FCC Wins
Topics
Location
Related Events
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

