Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 5:59am
CONTENT WILL ALWAYS BE KING
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Paul Vigna]
[Commentary] In the old days, the kind of broadside Viacom fired at Google -- demanding it take down more than 100,000 clips being distributed illegally on YouTube -- would have carried a bone-crunching thud. Instead, it fizzled: Many dismissed it as a negotiating tactic, at best. Media pundit and Web acolyte Jeff Jarvis was succinct in his appraisal: "fools." The Internet so thoroughly thrashed the music industry that most people assume the same unfair fight will break out over the distribution of video. It's the "I'm a Mac, I'm a PC" conflict on a large scale, with the media conglomerates cast as the helpless nerd. YouTube, Don Tapscott recently wrote on this editorial page, "has reinvented the television ballpark." But the studios don't need to kowtow to the Internet evangelizers, because there are significant differences between audio and video distribution. Web sites like YouTube won't be able to topple the networks as easily as file swappers wracked the music moguls. And Viacom's move yesterday to license its programming through the startup Joost.com may be a broadside that does find its target.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117203076381914611.html?mod=todays_us_opinion
(requires subscription)
Related
- Viacom’s Unusual Legal Tack Against YouTube -- And Why It Just Might Work
- EFF takes Viacom to task over YouTube takedown
- Viacom in $1 billion copyright suit versus Google, YouTube
- Google Says Viacom 'Covertly' Put Its Own Clips On YouTube
- Google Calls Viacom Suit on YouTube Unfounded
- Viacom Set to Appeal in YouTube Case
- YouTube Can't Be Liable on Copyright, Spain Rules
- YouTube, Viacom agree to mask viewer data
- Viacom Takes A Final Shot At YouTube
- YouTube is my network
- Old Model Versus a Speedster
- Viacom sued over Colbert parody on YouTube
- MPAA, IFTA File Amicus Brief In Viacom v. YouTube
- Meet the YouTube Stars Brands Love
- The case against YouTube
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

