Originally published: February 15, 2011
Last updated: February 15, 2011 - 4:05pm
For all the gray areas around what’s legal and illegal when it comes to repurposing content in the digital era, there’s one basic copyright principle people agree on in nearly every situation -- and you don't need to be a lawyer to figure out: You can't make a whole, perfect, 100% copy without permission. But depending on how the Righthaven litigation pans out, these types of cases could become much less clear cut—because we might be about to see 100% copying become legally justified in many situations. Two ways that could happen: A judge could rule that newspapers gave “implied license” to copy their content. That means that the newspaper already gave readers permission to freely copy its work, at least for non-commercial purposes. The logic goes like this: both of Righthaven’s two biggest newspaper clients, The Denver Post and the Las Vegas Review-Journal, have a set of tools next to their online stories that directly encourage readers to “share” that content.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Judge Undercuts Online Copyright Law, Here's What That Looks Like
- Court: Posting Entire News Article Was Fair Use
- Enforcing Copyrights Online, for a Profit
- Las Vegas's copyright crapshoot could maim social media
- Copyright on Imported Works
- Our social-media amnesia
- Viacom’s Unusual Legal Tack Against YouTube -- And Why It Just Might Work
- Facebook sued over 'like' button
- Copyright chief calls for crackdown on illegal streaming
- Copyright Dispute Ensnares Creator of Copyright Shield
- Google and the Copyright Wars
- Court Hands Huge Victory to Universities' Digitization Efforts
- Google Says Authors Can’t Sue Over Digital Books as Group
- The limits of copyright law
- War Against Cyberlockers Begins: MPAA Sues Hotfile
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

