Last updated: March 11, 2011 - 10:08am
In approving the resolution to nullify the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) open Internet rules, the Republican members of the House Communications Subcommittee (no Democrats voted to block the FCC) said they didn't care if big companies imposed unfavorable conditions on start-ups and didn't care if there was nowhere small companies could go if they felt disadvantaged.
In today’s Wonderland that is the House, real-world experience means nothing.The conclusions have been drawn. Off with the head of the FCC! The traditional arguments and politics that usually govern House Republican votes mean nothing. At the Subcommittee hearing held just prior to the vote, A leading small businesswoman says openness is needed for the Internet. Never mind. Even big business, which usually has the Republicans at its beck and call, is largely going along with the FCC rules. No matter. Instead, there is the power-centric view favoring telecom carriers. One witness who runs a wireless ISP said it was OK to block Netflix from going to his customers. Another, a former Wall Street analyst who fears for the financial safety of the Big Telecom companies, asked what would happen if Google decided to “withhold its services from Verizon in Boston but continue to provide them to Comcast,” which would be a problem for Verizon retaining customers.
Wonderland, indeed.
Instead, there are bizarre interpretations in which FCC rules which an open Internet rule is seen as a hindrance to small business, rather than an arbiter to which small companies could turn if they thought they were being taken advantage of by super carriers. And so the circus will reconvene on the 15th, when the full House Commerce Committee will vote to repeal the FCC rule, and the later in the week the full House will do so as well. It will all be cloaked in the sanctimony of curbing government and helping small business, but nothing will be further from the truth. All it will do is put entrepreneurs further behind when the big carriers decide the time is right to put the pressure on and they start charging for preferential “fast lanes” that start-ups can't afford, or requirements they can't meet.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- H.J. Resolution 37, Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband industry practices
- House approves measure to overturn FCC network neutrality rules
- House Republicans Win Early Battle Over Network Neutrality Rules
- Sen Hutchison: Network Neutrality Blocker Could Get Vote Next Week
- Net neutrality rules don't go far enough, but going farther wasn't politically possible
- FCC’s Efforts to Regulate Internet
- End of the Web as we know it?
- GOP rep voted to protect network neutrality out of competition concerns
- Sen Brown undecided on network neutrality vote
- House votes to stop FCC funding for network neutrality
- House Commerce Committee Votes to Repeal Open Internet Rules
- Will Marsha Blackburn be GOP’s next tech policy champion? Is she owned by telecom industry?
- POSTPONED: Vote on Resolution to Reverse FCC’s Internet Rules
- Public Interest Community Disappointed with FCC
- Al Franken Makes Senate Stand for Network Neutrality
Location
Related Events
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

