Originally published: April 12, 2011
Last updated: April 12, 2011 - 9:50pm
At the National Association of Broadcasters convention in Las Vegas, NAB Chairman Gordon Smith took aim at cable operators in defense of retransmission payments.
He called their channels "cable stations," and said they get paid for their content, and should get paid. But so should broadcasters, he said, drawing the parallel. "Stations deserve the right to negotiate for compensation of their programming. And we know that the system works, because thousands of agreements have been successfully negotiated over the years, with a success rate of over 99 percent." "Some pay-TV companies, however, want to pay nothing or only a pittance for local stations' signals - even though local content and network programming offered by broadcasters are the ones viewers watch most." Smith said that when he is talking about free TV, he means free to viewers, "not to multi-billion dollar corporations that sell subscriptions on the backs of our content."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- National Association of Broadcasters Conference
- Broadcasters Oppose Retransmission Reform
- NAB to FCC: Stay Out of Retransmission
- Online Spats Mean less Free TV On Web
- Reaction to FCC Retransmission Announcement
- How to Solve Retransmission Sharing
- ACA: Joint Agreements Should Count As Ownership
- McDowell: Don't Expect Big Changes From FCC On Retransmission
- FCC Takes a Fresh Look at Its Retransmission Consent Rules
- Comcast's Roberts Tells Genachowski: No Quick Retrans Fixes
- NAB Says Retransmission Process Works
- Smith To FCC: Voluntary Does Not Mean Forced Repacking
- Free Press, Consumers Union, PTC Ask FCC to Help Resolve Retrans Disputes
- Retransmission Reform Advocates Call for Government to Step in
- Media companies push back against Reps. Israel, King
Topics
Location
Related Events
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

