Originally published: April 13, 2011
Last updated: April 13, 2011 - 11:47am
The House of Representatives resumed its flight from reality on April 8 when it voted to repeal the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules to mandate an open and non-discriminatory Internet. The vote was 240-179, with six Democrats siding with the Republicans. On April 5, the House went through its warm-up act by approving the procedures used for the repeal, breaking out yet again the rambling, discredited arguments that have no basis in fact but which seem to take on additional merit when screeched at the top of a legislator’s lungs. No, the government is not about to “take control of your Internet,” as Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) vehemently argued. Nor is the government going to “assign priority and value” to content, as Rep Blackburn said. The concept behind a neutral Internet is quite simple: Those companies which provide access to the Internet can't play favorites. That’s the opposite of taking control and does not assign any priorities or values. That was the legal ground rule when the Internet was created, and which needs to be reinstated since the 2005 FCC decision taking away some of the FCC’s legal authority to enforce nondiscrimination.
The Republican side of the debate had almost a desperate, tin-hat conspiratorial air to it. Read paragraph 84, which will “squelch jobs and growth,” Blackburn said. Look at paragraph 47, footnote 148, Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden (R-OR) advised. One of those sets out the case-by-case basis for determining rule violations – a concept most liked for its flexibility. The other doesn't preclude a specialized offering, like Koshernet, as quoted in the order and it certainly isn't religious persecution. It says that network operators can't hide behind a Koshernet or like product that filters out some sites to get out of Net Neutrality obligations. If there were a dodge like that, the Net Neutrality rules, vague and incomplete as they are now, would be even more useless. Then again, neither Koshernet, nor any similar Web site, is a carrier.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Genachowski to Walden: Network neutrality won't ban Koshernet
- Rep Blackburn Slams FCC Rules as Net 'Iron Curtain'
- White House issues veto threat for repeal of network neutrality rules
- House Commerce Committee Vote on H.J. Res. 37
- House approves measure to overturn FCC network neutrality rules
- Senate rejects attempt to overturn FCC's network neutrality rules
- Industry-friendly subcommittee delivers for telecom firms
- Rep Blackburn Calls on Conservatives to Block Network Neutrality Rules
- House Republicans Win Early Battle Over Network Neutrality Rules
- Sen Brown undecided on network neutrality vote
- House Commerce Committee Votes to Repeal Open Internet Rules
- House Commerce Committee Considers Network Neutrality Repeal
- H.J. Resolution 37, Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband industry practices
- Al Franken Makes Senate Stand for Network Neutrality
- The Battle Over Net Neutrality Rages On
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

