Last updated: April 19, 2011 - 8:35am
In San Jose (CA), Apple asked US District Judge James Ware to dismiss a consumer antitrust lawsuit claiming the company limited choice by linking iPod music downloading to its iTunes music store.
Robert Mittelstaedt, an attorney for the company, told Judge Ware that blocking iPod music downloads that used competitors’ software was intended to improve downloading quality for iTunes customers. Changes that Apple made in 2004, just days after Internet music software company RealNetworks announced a technology allowing songs from its online store to be played on iPods, weren't anticompetitive, he said. “Apple’s view is that iPods work better when consumers use the iTunes jukebox rather than third party software that can cause corruption or other problems,” Mittelstaedt said at a hearing. Bonny Sweeney, a lawyer representing iTunes customers who sued, said the plaintiffs could not locate any legacy software that would allow them to conduct accurate tests, prompting Judge Ware to say that a trial may become a “battle of experts.” Judge Ware said he will rule by May on the request to dismiss the case.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Apple’s Jobs Must Answer Questions in ITunes Downloading Antitrust Dispute
- Music Fans: Dismantle DRM
- Apple's Jobs calls on music industry to drop DRM
- Royalty rate doesn't change for Apple, music retailers
- Apple Plots Reboot of iTunes for Web
- The death of the 30-second TV commercial
- Apple Will Reject DUI Checkpoints Apps
- Rivalry Between Apple and Palm Intensifies
- Apple joins forces with record labels
- Despite iTunes Accord, Music Labels Still Fret
- Google's music entreaties fall favorably on record companies' ears
- Apple Introduces iCloud
- Download biz has to change, or digital sales will be playing a swan song
- Apple Sues Amazon Over Term 'App Store'
- For Apple, Pressure Builds Over App Store Fraud
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

