Originally published: May 8, 2011
Last updated: May 8, 2011 - 9:18am
A bipartisan pair of legislators has introduced a bill that would put content, reception and signal-quality requirements on carriage of public access and government channels and require cable operators to pay for those channels regardless of state laws "affecting cable system franchising requirements relating to support for public, educational, or governmental use of a cable system."
Reps. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Steven LaTourette (R-OH) jointly introduced the Community Access Prevention (CAP) Act, which would amend the Communications Act to require that cable operators carry the channels without alteration or degradation, and make them viewable without additional equipment charges to every sub. The bill would also require the FCC to conduct a study on the impact of state video franchise laws on PEG channels, the impact of the conversion from analog to digital, and recommend changes if necessary, with the exception that cable cannot be allowed to charge for the quality, accessibility, functionality, or placement of the channels.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- AT&T access plan challenged
- Rep Baldwin Advocates for Community Access TV
- Martin: Pryor Safe TV Bill Not Good Enough
- PA Statewide-Franchise Bills Move Forward
- Genachowski Hopes FCC Will Deal With PEG Carriage Soon
- Genachowski Answers PEG Concerns
- Public, Educational, and Governmental Access Cable Television Channels: Issues for Congress
- Qwest Backs State Franchise Bill
- County should support URTV as a public asset
- Illinois Gov. Signs Franchise Law
- Ohio House OKs Franchise-Reform Bill
- Why Do We Care About FCC Authority Over Broadband?
- Waxman Says Commerce Committee Will Look Into Access to PEG Channels
- House Schedules Telecom Reform Bill Hearing
- COPE seen hurting localities
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

