Last updated: May 9, 2011 - 8:27am
The cellular phone industry, wielding the threat of litigation, intimidated San Francisco into shelving a law that would have required point-of-sale disclosure of phones' radiation levels.
The industry had similarly pressured the Federal Communications Commission to back down from its recommendation that customers consider a unit's specific absorption rate (the rate at which the body absorbs radiofrequency energy from a phone) when making a purchase. But the concerns about the potential danger of cell phone radiation will not go away so easily. In fact, almost all manufacturers include advice for customers to limit their exposure to radiation in phone user guides. Suggestions include using a hands-free device, keeping the phone away from the body when turned on and not using cases with metal parts. Verizon even said customers concerned about "your own or your children's RF exposure" should be "limiting the length of calls" as one option. Perhaps it's best that the battle shift to Sacramento. All Californians deserve to know more about the potential dangers of the devices they are holding against their ears.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- On Cell Phone Radiation
- San Francisco surrenders in fight over cell phone warnings
- Why cell phones may be more dangerous than we think
- San Francisco, CTIA to appeal trimmed cellular law
- Cell phone industry to sue SF over radiation information
- San Francisco puts cell phone radiation law on hold
- Cell phone safety advocates call on FCC, FDA to update rules, radiation standards
- FCC asks about cell phone safety
- WHO report questions cell phone risks
- Wireless industry group sues San Francisco over new cellphone radiation law
- San Francisco cellphone radiation label debate reaches courtroom
- San Francisco cellphone warning law fails science, says judge
- Gov. Brown has blind spot for cell phone offenders
- Cellphone industry attacks San Francisco's ruling on radiation
- Cell Phone Safety: What the FCC Didn't Test
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

