Submitted: September 10, 2007 - 9:03am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 8:59am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 8:59am
DISPERSED MEDIA OWNERSHIP SERVES DEMOCRATIC VALUES
[SOURCE: Seattle Times, AUTHOR: C. Edwin Baker, University of Pennsylvania]
[Commentary] The Federal Communications Commission is considering whether to reduce restrictions on broadcast-station ownership, an action that would permit greater media and press concentration. This is a bad idea. Bad for audiences, for citizens, and for democracy. Dispersed media ownership, ideally local ownership, serves democratic values, while conglomerate ownership and media mergers, which would be the result of reduced ownership restrictions, do the opposite.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2003874286_bakerop10.html?syndication=rss
Related
- Today's Quote 09.10.07
- Local news means ... more local news
- Failures of the American airwaves
- A clear, bubbling passion for watchdog journalism
- A clear, bubbling passion for watchdog journalism
- A clear, bubbling passion for watchdog journalism
- Seattle Media Ownership Hearing recap
- Media Consolidation Hearing In Seattle
- Clearing the air about radio and the community
- Bringing diversity to the nation's media
- Changing TV economics prompts fresh thinking about public airwaves
- Public input Vital on Media Regulation
- Dingell, Markey Ask Martin to Slow Down on Cross-Ownership Loosening
- Please, please, please, FCC
- A kick in the eye from the FCC
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

