Stay connected:
Submitted: October 4, 2007 - 11:05am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 9:45am
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 9:45am
FEDERAL JUDGE STANDS BY CONNECTICUT IPTV RULING
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
Judge Janet Bond Arterton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut has rejected AT&T's motion for reconsideration, standing by her previous ruling that the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control erred when it ruled that Internet protocol-delivered video products are not cable services and can't be regulated like them.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6486488.html
Links to Sources
Related
- CT Attorney General: Make AT&T Get Cable License
- AT&T Appeals Connecticut Court's U-verse Definition
- Connecticut Judge Stands Pat On AT&T U-verse Service
- Video Franchises in FL & CT
- Judge Sides With Programmers -- For Now -- In A La Carte Case
- Court Rules Against Iowa Cities Over Franchise Fees
- Iowa Judge Nixes New Fees
- Louisiana Utility Continues Broadband Fight
- Satellite TV Tax Shot Down in Ohio
- Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Chicago Cable-Modem-Fee Ruling
- Study Sees Mergers, Customer-Service Spending
- Court Denies Verizon's Maryland Injunction Request
- Connecticut Legislators Approve Franchise-Reform Bill
- Missouri Franchise Bill | Michigan Cable Tax
- Iowa Lawsuits Target Franchise Fees
Ratings
Recommendation:
0
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.