Last updated: June 15, 2011 - 8:50am
[Commentary] California State Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) introduced a bill to overturn the Supreme Court's decision and require officers to secure a warrant, based on a showing of probable cause, before they search a phone.
Leno's bill, SB 914, intelligently balances the needs of police with the historic limitations on their power to search; it has passed the Senate and deserves approval by the Assembly as well. People of varying politics should recognize the value of strong, clear rules to guide the actions of police. Libertarians no less than liberals should see that it serves no one to have police allowed the authority to snoop without guidance from the courts. Police are not allowed to search a suspect's house or his computer without probable cause, and there's no reason why they should be allowed to search his cell phone.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Gov Brown vetoes bill to limit cell phone searches
- California bill would block cellphone tracking without warrant
- California Location Privacy bill moves to full Senate vote
- Supreme Court to decide whether police can attach GPS device to a car without a warrant
- FBI Still Struggling With Supreme Court's GPS Ruling
- New law bans warrantless cell phone searches
- Cellphone Searches
- US court approves warrantless searches of cell phones
- On Cell Phone Radiation
- Ruling Spurs Debate on Digital Tracking
- Appeals court guts landmark computer privacy ruling
- A social media trend we don't 'like'
- Piracy and the 4th Amendment
- ACLU report: Warrantless tracking of cellphones ‘pervasive and frequent’
- Police GPS tracking case to be heard by Supreme Court
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

