Broadcast still likely to rule in 2012, but advanced ads could make cable attractive
Originally published: June 15, 2011
Last updated: June 15, 2011 - 10:15pm
Presidential Advisor David Axelrod and former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie may have been talking to a cable industry audience, but they used the The Cable Show stage to argue for the dominance of broadcast, especially local TV, in election ad spending.
While it may seem that cable provides the necessary targeting for election campaign messages, local television is "still the nuclear weapon," Axelrod said. "I still think broadcast's is going to get the lion's share," he said, noting that 68% of media spending went to stations in battleground markets in 2008. "It isn't always terribly efficient, but you hit a lot of people in that market and that market may be pivotal to the election." Gillespie agreed. "Independents, they're making decisions on large, national issues," he said. "The national ad campaign still going to be the most resonant."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Balancing Political Facts, Opinion a Delicate Balance in Cable News
- TV News Chiefs Say Don't Blame Media For Tucson
- What Kind of News Do People Really Want?
- ESPN Ends Relationship With Hank Williams Jr
- Just in Time for Holidays: First Ad Barrage of 2012 Race
- Passing the Disclose Act would shed some light on stealth campaign spending
- TV news aims to maintain audience
- Campaigns Spend $1 Million on TV Ads in One Day
- Political TV Ad Spending Picking Up After A Slow Start: Analyst
- Candidates Pitch on Sports Networks
- ESPN Acquires Exclusive Wimbledon TV Rights
- Who Fared Best (and Worst) in 2008?
- Iowa, Get Ready for Senators Instead of Santa
- Report: 2012 Political Ad Revenue to Break New Records
- Political Spending Expected to Soar in 2008 Election Cycle
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

