Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 10:19am
JUSTICES HEAR ARGUMENTS ON INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY LAW
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Linda Greenhouse]
The Supreme Court seems likely to uphold the constitutionality of a 2003 law called the Protect Act, the latest in a line of laws aimed at regulating Internet content. At the least, the Justices seemed likely to support a version of it they would construe narrowly to allay concerns the law is so broadly written as to make it a crime to share or even describe depictions of children in explicit sexual situations, even if the depictions are inaccurate, the supposed children do not really exist and the intention is innocent. Those concerns led the federal appeals court in Atlanta to declare the Protect Act unconstitutional last year.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/washington/31scotus.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)
Related
- Supreme Court Upholds Child Pornography Law
- Child porn law at center of free-speech case
- Federal Courts Order Seizure of Website Domains Involved in Advertising and Distributing Child Pornography
- Groups ask Obama for SCOTUS pick who, like Stevens, upholds indecency laws
- Top Court weighs broadcast indecency
- Judging video games
- U.S. court seems split over broadcast political ads
- Entertainment industry opposes California video-game law
- Key Senators Raise Doubts on Eavesdropping Immunity
- What Janet Jackson Reveals About Broadcasting
- A Discomfiting Threat to Free Speech
- A Prosecution Tests the Definition of Obscenity
- Court Panel Questions School Ban on Phones (in NYC)
- Supreme Court Asked to Restore Indecency Regulations
- EU court dismisses France Telecom fine appeal
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

