Originally published: July 11, 2011
Last updated: July 11, 2011 - 3:07pm
[Commentary] There’s the usual cacophony of subsidy junkies clamoring that we should go build a huge system of fast broadband that will reach every hovel in the land, no matter how rural. The questions is, as with the building of any other form of infrastructure, is cabling the nation actually worth it? Remember the important point here: infrastructure does not make us rich. People using infrastructure to do new things, or to do old things better or more cheaply might, but the cables, roads, railways and bridges of infrastructure do not, in and of themselves, impart wealth. Of course they don't, for they are a cost. We do have to pay to build them after all. There’s no benefit to be had from it so why bother and why tax everyone to provide something that doesn't improve matters?
- Does High Speed Broadband Increase Economic Growth?
- FCC Chairman Sees Rural Realities in Southwest Alaska
- We Can't Afford To Miss This Opportunity To Wire Rural America
- Broadband Deployment's "Best-in-Breed"
- AT&T Starts Telling Washington Why Its DirecTV Deal Should Pass
- Why Should I Care About CES?
- Keeping Low-Income Consumers in Mind While Reviewing the Verizon Spectrum Buy
- The double standard in regulation for managed services and OTT
- The Real Value of Public Broadcasting
- FCC Program to Expand Investment in Broadband Health Care Technology
- White House Roundtable Meeting with Rural Leaders
- Maybe you don’t need a gig. Wireless might bridge the broadband gap
- NECA Releases 2007 "Trends" Report
- Breaking News Takes a New Approach to the Personalized News Feed — A News Feed That’s Only Partly Personalized
- Policy issues key to small telco financial, competitive health