Originally published: July 12, 2011
Last updated: July 12, 2011 - 3:45pm
The Federal Communications Commission took action to protect Americans from "mystery fees" and "cramming," which is the illegal placement of an unauthorized fee onto a consumer's monthly phone bill.
Specifically, the FCC proposed rules that: (1) would require landline telephone companies to notify subscribers clearly and conspicuously -- at the point of sale, on each bill, and on their websites -- of the option to block third-party charges from their telephone bills, if the carrier offers that option; and (2) strengthen the Commission’s requirement that third-party charges be separated on bills from the telephone company’s charges. In addition, both landline telephone companies and Commercial Mobile Radio Service (“CMRS”) providers, such as wireless telephone companies, would have to include, on all telephone bills and on their websites, a notice that consumers may file complaints with the FCC and provide the Commission’s contact information for the submission of complaints.
These proposed rules would help landline telephone consumers detect unauthorized charges that may come from third parties by keeping all third-party charges separate from all telephone company charges, and would also help consumers block those charges. Most landline phone companies now allow consumers to block third-party charges, but may only tell consumers about that option after they have complained about an unauthorized charge. Because many consumers complain that it is difficult to get unauthorized charges resolved, the new rule on FCC contact information would let consumers know they can come to the agency for help if they need it.
In addition, today’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeks comment on several other measures that could help consumers detect, rectify, and prevent cramming. This Notice asks whether landline telephone companies should be: (1) required to offer subscribers the option to block third-party charges from appearing on their telephone bills; (2) required to notify consumers that they do not offer blocking service if they do not do so; (3) prohibited from assessing an additional fee for blocking services; and/or (4) prohibited from including third-party charges on telephone bills altogether.
The Notice also seeks comments on whether landline telephone companies and/or CMRS providers should be required to: (1) provide accurate contact information for third-party vendors on their telephone bills; and/or (2) screen third parties for prior rule violations or other violations of law before agreeing to place their charges on telephone bills. Finally, the Notice seeks comment on whether the same rules that apply to landline telephone companies also should apply to CMRS providers and to providers of interconnected Voice-over-Internet-Protocol (“VoIP”) service.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Chairman Rockefeller Reveals Investigation Into Telephone 'Mystery Charges'
- FCC Fines Companies for Cramming
- FCC Adopts Rules to Help Consumers Identify and Prevent Unauthorized Mystery Fees, Known as "Cramming," on Phone Bills
- Under congressional pressure, Verizon bans third-party charges on landlines
- Verizon Wireless to pay largest-ever settlement and consumer refund for "mystery fees"
- Chairman Rockefeller Tells FTC That Bogus Billing on Consumer Landline Phones is a Major Problem
- Federal Trade Commission Forum on Cramming
- Senate Commerce Committee Releases Report on Unauthorized Charges on Telephone Bills
- Recap -- Unauthorized Charges on Telephone Bills: Why Crammers Win and Consumers Lose
- FTC Seeks Return of $52 Million Worth of Bogus Phone Bill Cramming Charges; Agency Charges Nation's Largest Third-Party Billing Company with Contempt
- Chairman Rockefeller expands phone industry probe
- AT&T Agrees to End Third-Party Billing on Customer Phone Bills
- Open Federal Communications Commission Meeting (April 2012)
- Sen Klobuchar To FCC: Crack Down On 'Cramming'
- FCC Open Meeting (July 2011)
Topics
Location
Related Events
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

