Last updated: February 20, 2008 - 11:58pm
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] We opposed the V-chip and the program-content ratings when they came into being, largely because both were forced on the television industry. But the fact is, rather than constricting TV fare, the ratings and the V-chip could liberate it. Telling parents a program is going to be violent or sexy or both and giving them a way to stop their kids from watching puts the ultimate responsibility on the people who should be in charge: Mr. & Mrs. John Q. Public. Television is a selling machine. If the industry explains these television aids to the public, that would go a long way toward solving the indecency problem it has in Washington.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6288809?display=Opinion&referral=SUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
Related
- TV Watch: Parents Want the Remote Control
- FCC Hacks Away at V-Chip
- FCC Will Reassess V-Chip, Ratings System
- Will Kids Pay the Price for Recall Failures?
- PTC Pans, Valenti Defends TV Boss
- Stevens Touts Progress On TV, Radio 'Indecency'
- PTC Wants FCC To Revamp V-Chip/Ratings System
- Television Executives Rethink Ratings System
- As V-Chip goes Digital, do Consumers Care?
- FCC Defends Cussing Crackdown
- Media Groups Plan Education Effort
- Senate Commerce Chairs Cheer Content Campaign
- PTC Pans Content Descriptors
- TV Is Surrogate Parent, Says Clinton
- Federal Censorship Commission?
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

