Submitted: August 4, 2011 - 4:02pm
Originally published: August 4, 2011
Last updated: August 4, 2011 - 4:17pm
Originally published: August 4, 2011
Last updated: August 4, 2011 - 4:17pm
Source:
telecompetitor
Author:
Joan Engebretson
Location:
Rural Utilities Service (RUS), 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC, 20250, United States
Loans recently made to small telcos by the Rural Utilities Service would no longer be “financially feasible” if the Federal Communications Commission caps the Universal Service fund, according to data filed by the RUS with the FCC. The filing came to light just as the nation’s largest and smallest telephone companies announced they had reached accord on Universal Service and inter-carrier compensation reform. Although the large carriers apparently have agreed on a USF cap to the areas they serve, the smaller carriers are recommending that Universal Service funding for their service areas be allowed to continue to grow
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Rural Groups Urge FCC to Look Beyond Cuts and Caps for USF Reform
- Sparks fly at FCC Universal Service reform workshop
- Consolidation Pressure Leading to Co-op Hostile Takeover?
- Rural Broadband Alliance: FCC Has “Systemic Disdain” for Rural Telcos
- American Cable Association Recommends 16 Mb/s Broadband Target for USF
- AT&T exec: FCC will recommend 4 Mb/s broadband Universal Service target next month
- Universal Service Fund already supporting broadband
- Rural Telco Associations Ask FCC to Reconsider USF Reforms
- My Valentine’s Day with Rural Telcos: Know Hope
- Broadband (and maybe wireless) could be the future for small telcos
- USF Reform Battle Lines Being Drawn
- Rural Telco Groups to FCC: No Further ICC Reforms
- Keep Universal Service Fund close to current size
- NARUC Panel Supports USF Reform
- NCTA: FCC Should Shift $2 Billion In Phone Subsidies To Broadband By 2015
National Broadband Plan
Learn more about:
Topics
Location
Javascript is required to view this map.
Ratings
Recommendation:
2
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

