Last updated: August 30, 2011 - 8:50am
Democracy is not just the absence of oppression, but that it also involves challenging concepts of tolerance, compromise and civic responsibility yet to take root in Iraq, or in Libya. What emerged in Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein’s government was a society of everyone for themselves, individually and in small groups, grabbing for what they could get — literally, through looting, and eventually through the political process. This has made many Iraqis weary of the chaos of Iraqi-style democracy. Increasingly, they want a strong hand — elected by the people — to wield power. Some advice: Do not trust expatriates who rush back to stake a claim in the new government. Avoid a parliamentary system. And do not ostracize members of the former regime, as happened in Iraq under the so-called de-Baathification policy. Libyans should be wary of freedom of speech. In Iraq, they are now free to express themselves, which they could not do under Saddam Hussein. But this right is almost useless because the government is not responsive to the public.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Iraqi reporter risks it all for the story
- Searching for Saddam
- Iraqi TV station plays up U.S. losses
- Iraq Censorship Laws Move Ahead
- How a Misguided War Led to a Powerful Nonprofit Partnership
- Iraq mulls website ban, fuels censorship fears
- Halted '03 Iraq Plan Illustrates US Fear of Cyberwar Risk
- TV show allows Iraqis to voice their anger live
- Inside The Libyan Rebels' Mobile-Phone Network
- Middle East Unrest Leads the News
- Libya Threatens Death Penalty for People Caught Using Satellite Phones
- Senators flag Chinese telecom firm Huawei
- Pentagon tries to steer media coverage on Iraq
- Western Firms Aided Libyan Spies
- Here's an Unlike.ly Tale: Gadhafi Does Swimming.ly on the Internet
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

