Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 11:44am
THE FISA FOLLIES, REDUX
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] The Senate (reportedly still under Democratic control) seems determined to help President Bush violate Americans’ civil liberties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Majority Leader Harry Reid is supporting White House-backed legislation that would expand the administration’s ability to spy on Americans without court supervision and ensure that the country never learns the full extent of Mr. Bush’s illegal wiretapping program. It is now up to the House to protect Americans’ rights. Mr. Bush has already started issuing the ritual claims that if his bill is not passed instantly, Osama bin Laden will be telephoning his agents in the United States and no one will know. Let us be clear, Mr. Bush has always had the authority to order emergency wiretaps — and get court approval after the fact. That has never been the problem with FISA. The House should vote to extend last summer’s flawed rules for at least 30 days and go on recess, forcing the Senate to do the same thing, and then bring the whole matter to a conference committee. There will then be plenty of time for a real debate. Lawmakers and the rest of the nation should bear this in mind: Mr. Bush’s version of this law does not make intelligence-gathering more robust. Opponents like Senators Christopher Dodd and Patrick Leahy want to spy on Al Qaeda, too. They’re just not willing to do it in a way that undermines the very democracy that the spies, Congress and the president are supposed to be protecting.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/opinion/26sat1.html
(requires registration)
* The table is set for Monday, when the Senate will vote on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) attempt to end debate on the intelligence committee's bill. That motion to invoke cloture will need 60 votes to pass. If it does pass, then the Senate would immediately vote on the bill, which civil libertarians dislike for a number of reasons beyond its measure granting retroactive immunity to the telecoms.
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/005139.php
* State of the Outrage
[Commentary] Because Barbara Bush taught him to "use your words, George," her son the president, rather than actually mooning some Senate Democrats at the joint session of Congress on Monday night as he would like to do, will instead call them terrorist-lovers for refusing to give retroactive immunity to lawbreaking telecoms in the FISA bill, and he will call them partisan obstructionists for wanting to extend unemployment benefits in the economic stimulus bill now pending.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/state-of-the-outrage_b_83455.html
Related
- Compromising the Constitution
- House Votes to Reject Immunity for Phone Companies Involved in Wiretaps
- Senate to Debate Telecom Firms' Immunity in Surveillance Role
- House defeats stopgap extension of spy program
- Wiretapping battle heats up on Capitol Hill
- FISA negotiators near deal
- Senators seek end to telecom's immunity for spying program
- Democrats propose safeguards in Bush's spy program
- Senate Dems won't block FISA compromise
- Bush Wins on Spy Bill
- Bush, Democrats clash over new spy bill, immunity
- Mr. Bush v. the Bill of Rights
- Senate picks up work on wiretapping bill
- Dodd Wins Fight to Block Passage of Surveillance Legislation
- Those DEMs and the FISA Update
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

