Last updated: September 13, 2011 - 8:35am
[Commentary] In November, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could redefine the scope of privacy in an age of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance technologies like GPS devices and face-recognition software. The case, United States v. Jones, concerns a GPS device that the police, without a valid warrant, placed on the car of a suspected drug dealer in Washington, D.C. The police then tracked his movements for a month and used the information to convict him of conspiracy to sell cocaine. The question before the court is whether this violated the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures of our “persons, houses, papers, and effects.” It’s imperative that the court says yes. Otherwise, Americans will no longer be able to expect the same degree of anonymity in public places that they have rightfully enjoyed since the founding era. [Rosen is a law professor at George Washington University]
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Facebook to Be Probed in EU for Facial Recognition in Photos
- Police GPS tracking case to be heard by Supreme Court
- Court Case Asks if ‘Big Brother’ Is Spelled GPS
- Surveillance and Accountability
- Don't Tread That GPS on Me
- GPS and the Right to Privacy
- Supreme Court appears troubled by police use of GPS tracking without warrants
- Is GPS tracking too '1984'?
- Why the Supreme Court GPS Decision Won't Stop Warrantless Digital Surveillance
- Court Weighs Whether Corporations Have Personal Privacy Rights
- No Warrant Needed for GPS Monitoring, Judge Rules
- GPS Tracking Case Could Have Wide-Ranging Fallout
- Navigating the Supreme Court's GPS ruling
- Personal Privacy and the Right to Know
- Ruling Spurs Debate on Digital Tracking
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

