Originally published: September 15, 2011
Last updated: September 15, 2011 - 9:10pm
The National Religious Broadcasters told the Supreme Court that it thinks indecent speech, as "reasonably" defined by the Federal Communications Commission, should continue to be an acceptable exception to free speech protections. But beyond that, it argues that an indecent airing within the FCC's 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. prohibited window -- when the FCC has said children are most likely to be in the audience -- is tantamount to obscenity.
Obscenity is illegal, period, not simply subject to regulation by the FCC. While the National Association of Broadcasters has said it is looking for clearer guidance, not freedom from all indecency regulations, NRB's equating indecency with obscenity removes the First Amendment shield entirely, as the group recognizes.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- ACLU: FCC indecency regime no longer constitutional
- Who decides what's indecent on cable, late night?
- Rehr To D.C.: Clarify Indecency
- MAP to Supremes: Pacifica Can Stand and FCC Indecency Enforcement Regime Still Fall
- The FCC's decency dilemma
- One First Amendment
- NRB Amicus Brief Supports FCC On Indecency
- In New Term, Supreme Court Shifts Focus to Crime and First Amendment
- Supreme Court Upholds 'Fleeting Expletive' Rule for Now
- Looking At Violent Video Games Now, Seeing Indecency In The Future
- Supreme Court hears case on broadcast indecency
- NRB Asks FCC To Appeal Indecency Decision To Supremes
- Free Speech for Broadcasters, Too
- Supreme Court Schedules June 23 Conference on TV Profanity Case
- Broadcast 'Indecency' on Trial
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

